Believing in State's Rights is Now an Act of Terrorism!

Believing in State's Rights is Now an Act of Terrorism!

This is a response to the recent State’s Rights Resolution that died along party lines in Helena, MT (guess which party was opposed to State's Rights?). The resolution was very standard and was simply reaffirming what is already in the US Constitution and our own state constitution about individualsim, state's rights and the limiting power of the Federal Government. The only reason many states are even making these resolutions is in response to OBAMA trying to FORCE states to take bail out money.

The bail-out money all in itself is a major problem for 2 main reasons:
1. If the Fed gets a majority of ownership and desicion making power with the banks that took money, then why doesn't the Fed get the same powers from states who take money?

2. Many of the expansive projects in the bail out are only funded for a couple of years. This leaves the tax payers not only obligated to the massive debt made by the bail out, but now having to fund the expansive projects implemented in their state.

For the Left to be against this resolution is a clear sign of the deep rooted problems with their view of American government and all our rights as American/Montana citizens. It also reveals the depth of either their hatred for our American heritage or insurmountable ignorance of it. The Democrats dared say that by sending a message to Washington we are being anti-government, well, the real ant-government speech is from the Left.

Firstly, the audacity to segregate and demonize citizens who want to affirm to the Federal Government that we stand on the 10th Amendment of the Constitution is despicable. Especially, when they would dare compare citizens to terrorists in order to accomplish this divisive tactic. The language used in this resolution is much like the language also used by Ben Franklin, Patrick Henry, Abraham Lincoln, and the entire Constitutional Congress...does that mean they were terrorists too?

Secondly, if using the same language makes you guilty of being on the extreme; would it be safe to say that anyone who believes and propagates man made global warming or talks about saving the environment is potentially an eco-terrorists? Like the extremists who bomb SUV car lots or burn down multi-million dollar condos?

Thirdly, what is more ant-government? Writing a resolution to remind the Federal Government of their Constitutional boundaries according to the US Government, or trying to tear down the 10th amendment and local/individual governing? I say it is the Left that is the anti-government threat!

The Left can not be intellectually honest because their ideology can not measure up to either attribute (my new motto!).